Academic Misconduct Process at 91青青草
Section including information on Academic Misconduct Disciplinary Process, the Academic Misconduct Flowchart, and TurnItIn.com.
Academic Misconduct
The Academic Misconduct Resolution Flow Chart provides a visual illustration of the modes of resolution of alleged academic misconduct. The flow chart is intended to provide a brief overview of the Department of Student Conduct and Academic Integrity's (SCAI) misconduct resolution procedures.
VIEW Academic Misconduct Flowchart
An overview of Frequently Asked Questions by Faculty members.
-
Academic Misconduct Disciplinary Process FAQs
What Do I Do and How Do I Do It?
- Professor detects alleged academic misconduct.
- Professor contacts Department of Student Conduct and Academic Integrity (SCAI) for advice and information about student鈥檚 prior record. Phone: 470.578.3403 or email: scai@kennesaw.edu
- Professor may conduct informal resolution meeting with student by him/herself or with the help of a facilitator.
- Professor sets informal resolution meeting with student (this may take place at SCAI conference room, if coordinated with SCAI Department).
- Professor or facilitator explains the structure of the meeting.
- Professor reviews the section of the Student Code of Conduct the student has allegedly violated and explains the nature of the accusation, providing all available evidence.
- Accused student receives opportunity to explain the situation and provide any evidence relevant to the explanation.
- Professor should wait until the student is finished to ask clarifying questions, providing reciprocal courtesy for the student鈥檚 silence during the initial charge explanation.
- If student denies misconduct, professor determines if the explanation is satisfactory, in which case charges may be dropped. Educational dialogue should still usually take place prior to adjourning meeting.
- If student accepts responsibility, professor moves to educational dialogue on academic misconduct prior to discussion of sanctions.
- Educational dialogue should address the specific allegations as well as broader issues of academic misconduct.
- Following the dialogue, the professor states the academic sanctions deemed appropriate to the offense and explains the decision, taking the student鈥檚 cooperation in the conference into consideration as a factor in determining severity.
- If student accepts responsibility, the professor completes the electronic academic integrity incident form. A representative from SCAI then sends a confirmation email to the student's 91青青草 email that states the charge and resolution. The student has 5 business days after this confirmation letter is sent to contact SCAI if he or she believes that the case has not been resolved as stated.
- Professor explains purpose of centralized records.
- If student denies misconduct and professor remains unconvinced, the meeting is immediately concluded and the matter referred to the Department of Student Conduct and Academic Integrity for a formal hearing.
Running a Successful Informal Resolution Meeting
- Don鈥檛 take the issue any more personally than necessary. Stay professional.
- Have a neutral third party present to witness the meeting, if possible, as a safeguard against litigious students or challenge to decision, probably either a department chair or a SCAI Department staff member.
- Don鈥檛 allow the meeting to be derailed by irrelevant information; keep the dialogue focused.
- Expect emotional displays. Have a box of tissues handy.
- Be open to the possibility of a misunderstanding. Do not prejudge.
- Be consistent in sanctioning violations from student to student, but do not apply 鈥渃ookie-cutter鈥 mentality to response.
- Point out resources to help students avoid future such problems (tutoring labs, office hours, etc.).